<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog Smarter &#187; old media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattdunlap.org/tag/old-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattdunlap.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:32:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In many ways old media is better then new media</title>
		<link>http://mattdunlap.org/my-personal-blog/opinion/in-many-ways-old-media-is-better-then-new-media.html</link>
		<comments>http://mattdunlap.org/my-personal-blog/opinion/in-many-ways-old-media-is-better-then-new-media.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Dunlap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattdunlap.org/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You hear the term &#8220;old media&#8221; thrown around a lot now a days, usually when talking about the newspaper companies hemorrhaging cash on a quarterly basis. The New York Times Company reported a first-quarter loss [2009] of $74.5 million on Tuesday, compared with a loss of $335,000 in the period a year ago Source: nyt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hear the term &#8220;old media&#8221; thrown around a lot now a days, usually when talking about the newspaper companies hemorrhaging cash on a quarterly basis.</p>
<blockquote><p>The New York Times Company reported a first-quarter loss [2009] of $74.5 million on Tuesday,  compared with  a loss of $335,000 in the  period a year ago<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/business/media/22paper.html">nyt</a></p></blockquote>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-563" style="margin: 10px; border:none;" title="newspaper" src="http://mattdunlap.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/newspaper.jpg" alt="newspaper" width="300" height="225" />The fact is old media is not dying, it&#8217;s the medium to which they use is dying. The cost to print and distribute newspapers to a shrinking subscription group is obviously not working. It still amazes me that I see newspaper salesmen outside of Safeway by my house. &#8220;Free paper today?&#8221; he says, and I just wonder if he knows me? I see him probably 3 times a week&#8230; and I never see anyone taking the free paper. Sad thing is, I do read the news, but online. He should, and probably will eventually, try to sell premium content on the website of the newspaper. I do read the paper when I&#8217;m in a coffee shop waiting for a drink. I just hate clutter in my house and if I have newspapers coming daily Iwill end up having a huge pile of paper in some corner.</p>
<p><strong>What should they do? Simple, sell all the equipment on Craigslist and move towards magazines&#8230; People still love magazines!</strong></p>
<p>Old media is really the new media, but many bloggers don&#8217;t want you to know that. all 100 of the top <a href="http://technorati.com">Technorati blogs</a> are media companies. They have multiple editors, writers, <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">journalists</span> bloggers, etc&#8230; They didn&#8217;t start that way. Most were started by one person, then evolved into a media company. Granted old media like the New York Times is still trying to figure out how to use the internet, but in the long run, many &#8220;old media&#8221; news sources will make their ways up the list of top blogs because they have a true understanding for how to deliver news whether it is on paper or pixels. <strong>Is this a threat to new media?</strong> of course it is, so you will continue to only see stories on the web about the death of old media, not real story which is the death of old medium.</p>
<p>People still read newspapers, it&#8217;s just the way they deliver them is wrong. Every Friday morning I get a local newspaper on my steps, which then makes it directly to the trash. As I&#8217;m throwing it away I wonder why they do this? Wouldn&#8217;t they save money if they just asked me if I want it? Send me return stamped postcard with the paragraph: &#8220;Due to hemorrhaging money, we would like to know if you are reading our paper? &#8221; I would gladly check NO and send back&#8230; better yet, just say &#8220;Send back now&#8221; without having to even check a box.</p>
<img src="http://mattdunlap.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=489&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattdunlap.org/my-personal-blog/opinion/in-many-ways-old-media-is-better-then-new-media.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
