Posts Tagged ‘newspapers’

I heard Google is Outdated and Unhip on the Radio Today

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Driving and listening to Rob Black today compared Google to his father… Meaning Google is unhip and doesn’t know how to mix it up with the younger generation. Now, I’m 36 and feel a little depressed that I’m out of the 18-35 range, but I still feel that I know a lot about the internet. Of course, not as much as Google, but I find it funny that Rob basically called them out because Google Buzz is a flop.

google is old and unhipHe makes perfect sense, and it’s easy to see that Google is trying so hard to grab what Facebook and Twitter have seemed to nailed, social interaction, and social search. What peers are talking about and the information peers share amongst each other.

I was really disappointed when Google’s flagship social product “OpenSocial” died. It’s still around, but has no heartbeat. Since the group turned to a big spam board I called it quits. Now that I think about it, Google groups could be a really good social network, but gets no focus from Google and most groups eventually fade away.

OpenSocial was to compete with facebook apps, but on an open front. Opensocial would allow you to create apps for any social network. Sounded cool, but Google seems to think you can release a product and then let the buzz carry that product… Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way and Google has yet another social product get a lot of notice and then it fades.

So, is Rob black right?

Is Google relatively old?

Are they relatively old enough to be unhip and not able to connect with the new generations of Internet users?

What will Google look like in 5 years? They want to advertise in pretty much every medium realm known to man… So, I think they are going to just be a huge advertising company. they already are huge, but not known for it.

I personally think think Rob is onto something… I’ve talked about this with my friends and we all seem to agree that the search results from Google are getting worse and worse. Recently trying to find a tutorial for a simple Flash application, I was finding results dated back to 2004, not one or two, but half of the first page search results… 6 year old results for a product that has evolved many times in that period. Those search results are absolutely useless.

I do find it easier to just Tweet the question, or post to Facebook and let someone guide me the answer. Google better figure out how to do that or else there cherished Pagerank algorithm will be nothing more theĀ  dusty old media, like newspapers and magazines.

In many ways old media is better then new media

Monday, July 13th, 2009

You hear the term “old media” thrown around a lot now a days, usually when talking about the newspaper companies hemorrhaging cash on a quarterly basis.

The New York Times Company reported a first-quarter loss [2009] of $74.5 million on Tuesday, compared with a loss of $335,000 in the period a year ago
Source: nyt

newspaperThe fact is old media is not dying, it’s the medium to which they use is dying. The cost to print and distribute newspapers to a shrinking subscription group is obviously not working. It still amazes me that I see newspaper salesmen outside of Safeway by my house. “Free paper today?” he says, and I just wonder if he knows me? I see him probably 3 times a week… and I never see anyone taking the free paper. Sad thing is, I do read the news, but online. He should, and probably will eventually, try to sell premium content on the website of the newspaper. I do read the paper when I’m in a coffee shop waiting for a drink. I just hate clutter in my house and if I have newspapers coming daily Iwill end up having a huge pile of paper in some corner.

What should they do? Simple, sell all the equipment on Craigslist and move towards magazines… People still love magazines!

Old media is really the new media, but many bloggers don’t want you to know that. all 100 of the top Technorati blogs are media companies. They have multiple editors, writers, journalists bloggers, etc… They didn’t start that way. Most were started by one person, then evolved into a media company. Granted old media like the New York Times is still trying to figure out how to use the internet, but in the long run, many “old media” news sources will make their ways up the list of top blogs because they have a true understanding for how to deliver news whether it is on paper or pixels. Is this a threat to new media? of course it is, so you will continue to only see stories on the web about the death of old media, not real story which is the death of old medium.

People still read newspapers, it’s just the way they deliver them is wrong. Every Friday morning I get a local newspaper on my steps, which then makes it directly to the trash. As I’m throwing it away I wonder why they do this? Wouldn’t they save money if they just asked me if I want it? Send me return stamped postcard with the paragraph: “Due to hemorrhaging money, we would like to know if you are reading our paper? ” I would gladly check NO and send back… better yet, just say “Send back now” without having to even check a box.

The question is, how can a business owner use OLD MEDIA on the NEW MEDIUM to grow relationships and build authority? I'll be talking about that in my next post.